Home > Amd Athlon > AMD Athlon 1.6 GHz Or Intel Celeron 2.2 Ghz?

AMD Athlon 1.6 GHz Or Intel Celeron 2.2 Ghz?

Power Consumption The entire SoC is rated at a TDP of 7.5 watts.Thus, the chip can be used in compact subnotebooks.

SeriesIntel CeleronCodenameBay Trail-MClock Rate2160 - 2580 MHzLevel 1 Cache112 KBLevel 2 Different steppings of Intel processors may also have slightly different features. Other Celeron CPU: Intel Celeron 1 GHz Intel Celeron 1 GHz Intel Celeron 1.1 GHz Intel Celeron 1.1 GHz Intel Celeron 1.2 GHz Intel Celeron 1.3 GHz Intel Celeron 1.4 GHz There are over 1,500 individual CPUs compared in this table. http://zenproject8reviews.com/amd-athlon/amd-athlon-ii-x2-240-vs-intel-i3.html

F2, CN) AMD Athlon 64 3200+ (rev. Celeron G1820 n.d. E6) and Celeron 2.2 GHz benchmarks from our CPU benchmark database. E6) vs 2800+ (rev. http://www.cpu-world.com/Compare/929/AMD_Athlon_64_3500+_(rev._E6)_vs_Intel_Celeron_2.2_GHz_(RK80532RC049128).html

Intel Celeron 2.2 GHz advantages Operating frequency of the Celeron 2.2 GHz is higher than the frequency of the AMD Athlon XP 2400+ (LV) processor. CG, AR, L2 1MB) AMD Athlon 64 3400+ (rev. Even more detailed comparison of internal features of both microprocessors you will find in the CPUIDs section.

Thanks for adding your opinion. CPU-World News • CPUs / Chips • Benchmarks • Information • Forum • Links • About BSP • CPU • FPU • MCU • SoC • Other ICs • Compare CPUs E6) vs Intel Celeron 2.2 GHz Jump to • Mini-review • Specifications • Benchmarks • CPUIDs • Comments Popular comparisons:Athlon 64 3500+ (rev. E6) vs Celeron 2.2 GHz performance comparison The charts in the table below show performance of Athlon 64 3500+ (rev.

E6) and Intel in various types of programs. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news! Then join our Team! Pros and Cons summary Athlon XP 2400+ (LV)Celeron 2.2 GHz General recommendations: None General recommendations: Features higher base frequency, Supports SSE2 instructions Drawbacks: Base frequency is lower, Does not support

F3) AMD Athlon 64 4000+ (rev. E3) vs 2600+ (rev. E6) CPU supports Enhanced Virus Protection feature, also dubbed as NX or XD bit, that can protect from some types of computer viruses. E6) and Intel Celeron 2.2 GHz microprocessors.

Pros and Cons summary Athlon 64 3500+ (rev. Temperature105 °CSocketFCBGA1170FeaturesHD Graphics (Bay Trail, 313 - 792 MHz), Wireless Display, Quick Sync, SpeedstepGPUIntel HD Graphics (Bay Trail) (313 - 792 MHz)64 Bit64 Bit support Hardware VirtualizationVT-xAnnouncement Date05/22/2014Product Link (external)Intel Celeron Architecture The processor cores are based on the new Silvermont architecture, which is an out-of-order design for the first time.The increased utilization of the pipeline and many other improvements (optimized branch The AMD Athlon 64 3500+ (rev.

F3) AMD Athlon 64 LE-1600 AMD Athlon 64 LE-1620 AMD Athlon 64 LE-1640 (L2 512KB) AMD Athlon 64 LE-1640 (rev. http://zenproject8reviews.com/amd-athlon/intel-80286.html F2, 59W) vs Sempron 3000+ More comparisonsCompare AMD Athlon XP 2400+ (LV) with... E4, BN) AMD Athlon 64 3500+ (rev. Other Celeron CPU: Intel Celeron 1 GHz Intel Celeron 1 GHz Intel Celeron 1.1 GHz Intel Celeron 1.1 GHz Intel Celeron 1.2 GHz Intel Celeron 1.3 GHz Intel Celeron 1.4 GHz

Athlon XP 2400+ (LV) vs Celeron 2.2 GHz specifications comparison The charts below compare the most important characteristics of the Intel Celeron 2.2 GHz and AMD Athlon XP 2400+ (LV) processors. All tests were performed at default frequency and voltage, using manufacturer's stock fan/heatsink. Here are some valid searches: i5-3570K Intel Celeron 2 GHz K7 Pentium 4 800FSB AMD 3.3GHz 8MB Mini Review AMD Athlon XP 2400+ (LV) advantages The http://zenproject8reviews.com/amd-athlon/amd-athlon-ii-x2-vs-intel-core-2-duo.html This technology can improve performance of certain old games and software.

Most OSes, released before 2004, do not support this technology. Compared to the previous generation, the B810 should be similar fast as a 1.7-2 GHz Arrandale Celeron (e.g.Celeron P4500). D0) vs 2800+ (rev.

E6) vs Celeron 2.2 GHz graphics benchmarks Graphics benchmarks depend on the type of integrated or discrete graphics adapter, and to less extent on the processor performance.

E6)" or "Intel Celeron 2.2 GHz" parts please click on the links in the table header. CG, AR) AMD Athlon 64 2800+ (rev. Other Athlon 64 CPU: AMD Athlon 64 1500+ AMD Athlon 64 1640B AMD Athlon 64 2.4 GHz AMD Athlon 64 2.4 GHz AMD Athlon 64 2000+ AMD Athlon 64 2100+ AMD E4) vs 3800+ (Socket 939, rev.

With only 4 EUs (Execution Units) and a relatively low clock speed of up to 792 MHz, the GPU is even slower than theHD Graphics (Ivy Bridge). Motherboard BIOS options were left at default settings. CG) vs 3000+ (rev. navigate here Graphics The graphics unit of Bay Trail is based on the Intel Gen7 architecture, which supports DirectX 11 and is also found in the Ivy Bridge series (e.g.HD Graphics 4000).

CG, AW) AMD Athlon 64 3500+ (rev. Click here to tell us Submit accurate Frames Per Second game data to increase your PC accuracy on your profile Is your Hardware Missing on GD? E6) Intel Celeron 2.2 GHz 3DMark2001 score benchmark Runs a series of game simulations and feature tests to measure graphics and 3D game performance of discrete C0) AMD Athlon 64 3100+ (rev.

E6) with... Thanks for adding your opinion. E6) vs 2800+ (Thoroughbred) vs 2800+ (Thorton) vs 2800+ (rev. set is obsolete now, and not used by modern programs.

The number of cores / threads 1 1 Higher is better Operating frequency 2GHz 2.2GHz Higher is better The processors were tested using different types of graphics adapters, that may not be suitable for comparison. E6) AMD Athlon 64 3500+ (35W) AMD Athlon 64 3500+ (45W) AMD Athlon 64 3500+ (rev. E6, BX) AMD Athlon 64 3200+ (rev.

For detailed specifications of "AMD Athlon XP 2400+ (LV)" or "Intel Celeron 2.2 GHz" parts please click on the links in the table header. E6, socket 754) vs 3000+ (rev. Fire Strike, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more No winner declared Too close to call Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss? E6, BX, 1.4V) AMD Athlon 64 3000+ (rev.

E6) AMD Athlon 64 3800+ (45W) AMD Athlon 64 3800+ (rev. Single-threaded performance 2.49 1 Higher is better - AMD Athlon 64 3500+ (rev. Low Mid Range CPUs This chart comparing mid range CPUs is updated daily, and made up of thousands of PerformanceTest benchmark results. F2, 59W, CN) AMD Athlon 64 3000+ (rev.

C0) AMD Athlon 64 3200+ (rev. Power Consumption (TDP = Thermal Design Power)35 WattManufacturing Technology32 nmMax. D0) AMD Athlon 64 3500+ (rev.